Coastal Flood Damage and Adaptation Costs under 21st Century Sea-Level Rise¶
Hinkel, J., Lincke, D., Vafeidis, A. T., Perrette, M., Nicholls, R. J., Tol, R. S. J., Marzeion, B., et al. (2014). Coastal Flood Damage and Adaptation Costs under 21st Century Sea-Level Rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), 3292-3297.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Managed Retreat
- In the climate case the defended position is a low-lying neighborhood; the rising cost-of-defense trajectory is the escalating spend on sea walls, pumping, repeated repairs, and ballooning flood-insurance subsidies, climbing non-linearly as storm surge and tide gain on fixed defenses.
This sourceQuantifies escalating coastal protection and damage costs under sea-level rise, the rising cost-of-defense trajectory that can flip the net in favor of retreat.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Hinkel et al. quantify rising dike investment and maintenance costs under sea-level rise, but find them roughly proportional to sea-level rise and do not cover pumping or insurance subsidies.
“The additional costs of protecting against sea-level rise via dikes are proportional to sea level rise, which itself is roughly linear in temperature at this time scale”
- In the climate case the defended position is a low-lying neighborhood; the rising cost-of-defense trajectory is the escalating spend on sea walls, pumping, repeated repairs, and ballooning flood-insurance subsidies, climbing non-linearly as storm surge and tide gain on fixed defenses.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:865017eaee1c · see in the full table