Fundamentals of Language

Jakobson, R., & Halle, M. (1956). Fundamentals of Language.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Textbook

Year

1956

DOI

10.1515/9783110900972 did not resolve

DOI registrant

De Gruyter

Link

https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsofla00jako

Cited from

art_aesthetics, literature_literary_theory

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Contrast
  • Jakobson and Halle (1956) gave this structural pattern its sharpest formal treatment in their account of distinctive features, where each phoneme is constituted by a bundle of binary oppositions activated within a comparison system.

    SupportedVerified against the work's full text

    Jakobson and Halle define phonemes as bundles of concurrent distinctive features, each a yes-no choice between two opposed terms, held in the language's code.

    “Each of the distinctive features involves a choice between two terms of an opposition that displays a specific differential property”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

• Metonymy
  • "The Crown" stands for the monarchy; a brand logo for a corporation; a pointer for the data at its address.

    This sourceThe chapter "Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances" gives the canonical metaphor (similarity) versus metonymy (contiguity) distinction.

Verification

Does it exist? Not confirmed. The DOI recorded for this work did not resolve when it was last checked, so it is shown above but not linked. The citation may still be sound; the recorded identifier is not. Flagged for repair.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.

• https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110900972 ×1

Registry ID ref:86f1568198a7 · see in the full table