Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering.

Marler, R. T., & Arora, J. S. (2004). Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26(6), 369-395.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

2004

Volume

26

Issue

6

Pages

369-395

DOI registrant

Springer Nature

Link

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6matched

Cited from

operations_research

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Multiobjective Optimization
  • In operations research applications, MOO supports supply-chain design (cost vs service level vs risk), production scheduling (throughput vs setup cost vs due-date adherence), and routing (cost vs time vs fuel consumption), with Marler and Arora (2004) surveying the engineering-design landscape across these and adjacent applications.

    This sourceComprehensive engineering-focused survey of MOO methods, scalarization techniques, and application domains across structural and multidisciplinary design.

    Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

    The abstract shows Marler & Arora (2004) is a survey of MOO concepts and methods for engineering problems, but it names none of the supply-chain, production-scheduling, or routing applications the sentence attributes to it.

    “A survey of current continuous nonlinear multi-objective optimization (MOO) concepts and methods is presented. It consolidates and relates seemingly different terminology and methods.”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:877de29c2630 · see in the full table