Rhetorical Listening¶
Ratcliffe. (1999). Rhetorical Listening: A Trope for Interpretive Invention and a “Code of Cross-Cultural Conduct. College Composition & Communication.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Rhetorical Listening
- Argument and composition pedagogy — teaching students to read another's discourse for its named stakes and genuine points of difference rather than scanning it for the weakest point to rebut, the parse-before-respond discipline drilled in writing and argument instruction. Cross-difference communication instruction — the concept's originating context (Ratcliffe): teaching listeners to read across identity difference (race, gender, class) where positional gaps produce systematic failures of hearing, with the accountability parse making the listener's own positionality part of the analysis
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“I offer an extended definition of rhetorical listening as a trope for interpretive invention; (5) I demonstrate how it may be employed as a code of cross-cultural conduct; and (6) I listen to a student’s listening.”
- Argument and composition pedagogy — teaching students to read another's discourse for its named stakes and genuine points of difference rather than scanning it for the weakest point to rebut, the parse-before-respond discipline drilled in writing and argument instruction. Cross-difference communication instruction — the concept's originating context (Ratcliffe): teaching listeners to read across identity difference (race, gender, class) where positional gaps produce systematic failures of hearing, with the accountability parse making the listener's own positionality part of the analysis
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8953431066a0 · see in the full table