Hickman v. Taylor¶
U.S. Supreme Court. (1947). Hickman v. Taylor.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Memoing
- Clinical practice. Progress notes and the chronological problem-oriented record carrying the clinician's in-flight reasoning — assessment, differential, plan — alongside the patient-state record. Legal practice. Attorney work product — research notes, strategy memos, internal deliberations — recognized as a distinct, valuable object and protected by privilege precisely because the reasoning trace matters.
This sourceU.S. Supreme Court decision establishing the attorney work-product doctrine, protecting an attorney's research notes, strategy memos, and internal deliberations from disclosure—a reasoning trace shielded so it can be candid enough to be useful.
- Clinical practice. Progress notes and the chronological problem-oriented record carrying the clinician's in-flight reasoning — assessment, differential, plan — alongside the patient-state record. Legal practice. Attorney work product — research notes, strategy memos, internal deliberations — recognized as a distinct, valuable object and protected by privilege precisely because the reasoning trace matters.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:89e14a8a5505 · see in the full table