A manifesto for reproducible science¶
Munafò, Nosek, Bishop, Button, Chambers, Sert, P. d., Simonsohn, et al. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Reproducibility & Replicability
- Before launching, the Chief Risk Officer requests a more rigorous verification, specifically raising concerns about: (a) Whether the finding would replicate in a separate dataset and time window, (b) Whether the finding reflects causation or selection — customers who choose to use certain features may differ systematically from those who do not, and © Whether a proposed marketing intervention would produce the same effect as the observed passive association
This sourceIdentifies methods, reporting, reproducibility, evaluation, and incentives as the loci of reform; frames replication infrastructure as a verification system whose specifications are the methods and protocols of the original studies.
- Before launching, the Chief Risk Officer requests a more rigorous verification, specifically raising concerns about: (a) Whether the finding would replicate in a separate dataset and time window, (b) Whether the finding reflects causation or selection — customers who choose to use certain features may differ systematically from those who do not, and © Whether a proposed marketing intervention would produce the same effect as the observed passive association
- Verification
- Each of these recognitions is structurally cheap because the underlying schema is the same — a point Munafò et al. (2017) make explicit in framing the replication crisis as a verification-infrastructure problem analogous to software regression testing.
This sourceIdentifies methods, reporting, reproducibility, evaluation, and incentives as the loci of reform; frames replication infrastructure as a verification system whose specifications are the methods and protocols of the original studies.
- Each of these recognitions is structurally cheap because the underlying schema is the same — a point Munafò et al. (2017) make explicit in framing the replication crisis as a verification-infrastructure problem analogous to software regression testing.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:89e8ce0ffb0c · see in the full table