Technological due process¶
Citron, D. K. (2008). Technological due process. Washington University Law Review, 85(6), 1249-1313.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Procedural Fairness (Due Process)
- Algorithmic and Platform Governance. The emergence of algorithmic decision-making in lending, hiring, content moderation, criminal risk assessment, and benefits adjudication has revived procedural fairness as a centerpiece of algorithmic accountability and AI governance, a shift Citron (2008) named "technological due process"—the project of porting notice, hearing, and reasoned-justification protections into rule-bound automated systems.
This sourceDiagnoses the erosion of classical procedural protections in automated administrative decision-making (e.g., benefits eligibility, no-fly lists) and proposes "technological due process": embedding transparency, audit trails, testing, and rule-articulation requirements directly into the design of governmental decision systems.
- Algorithmic and Platform Governance. The emergence of algorithmic decision-making in lending, hiring, content moderation, criminal risk assessment, and benefits adjudication has revived procedural fairness as a centerpiece of algorithmic accountability and AI governance, a shift Citron (2008) named "technological due process"—the project of porting notice, hearing, and reasoned-justification protections into rule-bound automated systems.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:89fbf46e1168 · see in the full table