Evaluation¶
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Sage.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Counterfactual Subtraction
- Programme evaluation: with-project trajectory minus without-project trajectory, the residual taken as the programme's impact.
This sourceStandard programme-evaluation text defining impact as the with-project minus without-project (counterfactual) outcome.
- Programme evaluation: with-project trajectory minus without-project trajectory, the residual taken as the programme's impact.
- Inquiry-Change Learning Loop
- Finally, derive the next change from the revised model rather than directly from the discrepancy — the step most often skipped, and the one that separates cumulative inquiry from chasing the last surprise.
This sourceDistinguishes theory failure from implementation failure as separate explanations of a disappointing result, each carrying a different remedy.
- Finally, derive the next change from the revised model rather than directly from the discrepancy — the step most often skipped, and the one that separates cumulative inquiry from chasing the last surprise.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8a3863c34b86 · see in the full table