Administrative Behavior

Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

1947

Link

https://archive.org/details/administrativebe0000simo

Cited from

behavioral_economics, law_governance, military_strategic_studies, organizational_management, sociology_anthropology

Cited by

5 citations across 5 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Authority
  • Authority has four structural hallmarks, as Simon (1947) develops in his analysis of formal organizations: (1) it operates prospectively — the agent can bind the subject to future conduct without renegotiation; (2) it is scope-bound — authority to decide pay scales does not extend to hiring criteria; (3) it depends on recognition — the subject must at least accept the legitimacy framework, even if disagreeing with the particular decision; (4) it is separable from competence — an authority figure need not be the smartest or most virtuous actor, only the one positioned to decide.

    This sourceAnalyzes authority in formal organizations via the zone of acceptance (after Barnard's zone of indifference): the pre-defined region within which a subordinate accepts orders without case-by-case re-examination — the canonical organizational formulation of pre-positioned, scope-bound, recognition-dependent authority separable from the merits of any particular decision.

• Authority Delegation Under Uncertainty
  • Authority Delegation Under Uncertainty encodes the pattern: unknowable-contingencies → pre-positioned-scope → distributed-judgment-and-action, a structural move Simon (1947) named the zone of acceptance: a pre-defined region within which an agent commits in advance to act on the delegator's authority without case-by-case approval.

    This sourceMacmillan. Introduces the zone of acceptance (after Barnard's zone of indifference): the region within which a subordinate acts on delegated authority without case-by-case approval.

• Bounded Rationality
  • - Not only about humans. Organizations, markets, and algorithms are all bounded-rational in the same sense — they operate under information, time, and computation constraints and use procedures adapted to those constraints.

    This sourceMacmillan. (4th ed. 1997, Free Press.) Carnegie-School foundational text establishing bounded rationality for organizations: search, evaluation, stopping rules and satisficing rather than global optimization; supports the organizations-as-bounded-rational and economics-foundation claims.

• Discretion
  • Herbert Simon's (1947) analysis of administrative behavior framed this as the rational necessity of decentralizing decisions to where the relevant facts and bounded-rational capacity actually reside.

    This sourceBounded rationality and the 'zone of acceptance'; the rational necessity of decentralizing decisions to where the relevant facts and bounded-rational capacity reside.

• Oversight Capacity
  • Oversight Capacity is the principle that any single overseeing entity—a manager supervising direct reports, a teacher managing students, a software orchestrator coordinating tasks, a root node in a hierarchical system—can effectively handle only a finite number of direct sub-units, relationships, or responsibilities before oversight quality, coordination efficiency, and decision-making depth deteriorate

    This sourceMacmillan. Introduces the zone of acceptance (and the related zone of indifference, after Barnard): the pre-defined region within which a subordinate accepts orders or acts on delegated authority without case-by-case approval — the canonical organizational formulation of pre-positioned scope.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:8a5fa2c25b4b · see in the full table