On the Jeffreys-Lindley Paradox¶
Robert. (2014). On the Jeffreys-Lindley Paradox. Philosophy of Science.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Jeffreys-Lindley Paradox
- Bayesian statistics — the canonical motivating example for the p-value crisis literature, objective/non-local priors, and the proposal to redefine significance thresholds
This sourceThe paradox's central place in frequentist-versus-Bayesian testing debates and in the problem of choosing priors, improper ones especially, for Bayesian tests.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Bayesian statistics — the canonical motivating example for the p-value crisis literature, objective/non-local priors, and the proposal to redefine significance thresholds
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8ac7c7d3aa00 · see in the full table