The Methodology of Evaluation.¶
Scriven, M. (1967). The Methodology of Evaluation. Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Formative Assessment
- The boundary between formative and summative is itself a deliberate distinction Scriven (1967) introduced in his AERA monograph The Methodology of Evaluation, where he separated evaluation conducted to improve a program-in-progress from evaluation conducted to judge a finished program; the same conceptual move underlies the inventory below.
This sourceRand McNally. Original formative-vs-summative evaluation distinction (improving a program-in-progress vs. judging a finished one); the conceptual root cited at D48-114. BibSonomy record
- The boundary between formative and summative is itself a deliberate distinction Scriven (1967) introduced in his AERA monograph The Methodology of Evaluation, where he separated evaluation conducted to improve a program-in-progress from evaluation conducted to judge a finished program; the same conceptual move underlies the inventory below.
- Summative Assessment
- (1) Summative assessment is the evaluation of learning at the conclusion of a defined instructional period — a unit, course, program, or educational phase — for purposes of certifying achievement, grading, program evaluation, accountability, placement, or selection, as Scriven (1967) first articulated when he distinguished formative from summative roles in his AERA monograph on the methodology of evaluation.
This sourceRand McNally. Original distinction between formative evaluation (conducted to improve a program while it is still being developed) and summative evaluation (conducted to render a final judgment); the conceptual root of the formative-versus-summative distinction in classroom assessment.
- (1) Summative assessment is the evaluation of learning at the conclusion of a defined instructional period — a unit, course, program, or educational phase — for purposes of certifying achievement, grading, program evaluation, accountability, placement, or selection, as Scriven (1967) first articulated when he distinguished formative from summative roles in his AERA monograph on the methodology of evaluation.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8af204740429 · see in the full table