Toward a Process Analysis of Emotions¶
Meyer, W., Reisenzein, R., & Schützwohl, A. (1997). Toward a Process Analysis of Emotions: The Case of Surprise. Motivation and Emotion.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Expectation Violation
- Four parts are load-bearing in that order: a model in force before the event; a realization that speaks to the same question the model answered; a mismatch above the level at which the system would otherwise absorb it; and a registered response — surprise, slowed processing, a shift of attention, model revision, or repair.
This sourceSets out the schema-discrepancy account in which an active schema, a discrepant event, a discrepancy signal crossing a threshold, and an interruption of ongoing processing with measurable cost are separate consecutive stages.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract confirms surprise elicits consecutive processes including a relevance/appraisal check with a measurable response delay, but says the studies evidence only one of those processes — not the ordered four-part sequence.
“Based on an earlier model of the processes elicited by surprising events, the present studies provide evidence for one of these processes, the evaluation of the surprising event's relevance for ongoing activities (action-relevance check).”
- Four parts are load-bearing in that order: a model in force before the event; a realization that speaks to the same question the model answered; a mismatch above the level at which the system would otherwise absorb it; and a registered response — surprise, slowed processing, a shift of attention, model revision, or repair.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8b96cfca6819 · see in the full table