Cultures and Organizations¶
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, Jan, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Intercultural Communication
- The field's instruments compress that catalog by replacing thousands of culture-pair stories with a small set of dimensions on which any culture takes a value: Hall's single high-context/low-context axis, Hofstede's four-to-six scales (power distance, individualism-collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity-femininity, long-term orientation, and indulgence versus restraint)
This sourceThe Hofstede framework's dimension scales and Hall's high-/low-context axis as instruments for reducing a culture to a value on named dimensions.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- The field's instruments compress that catalog by replacing thousands of culture-pair stories with a small set of dimensions on which any culture takes a value: Hall's single high-context/low-context axis, Hofstede's four-to-six scales (power distance, individualism-collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity-femininity, long-term orientation, and indulgence versus restraint)
Mechanisms¶
- Cultural Fit Workshop
- Frameworks like Hofstede's cultural dimensions can help name the norm differences on the table — provided they are used as a lens for a conversation, not as fixed labels, since they describe populations on average
This sourceUses dimensions to describe statistical differences among national cultures while warning against treating the scores as fixed labels for individuals.
- Frameworks like Hofstede's cultural dimensions can help name the norm differences on the table — provided they are used as a lens for a conversation, not as fixed labels, since they describe populations on average
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8be069ebf11f · see in the full table