Eine Verallgemeinerung der Quantenbedingungen für die Zwecke der Wellenmechanik.

Wentzel, G. (1926). Eine Verallgemeinerung der Quantenbedingungen für die Zwecke der Wellenmechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 38(6–7), 6-7.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1926

Volume

38

Issue

6–7

Pages

6-7

DOI

10.1007/bf01397171

DOI registrant

Springer Nature

Link

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397171

Cited from

physics

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Correspondence Principle
  • Examples: quantum mechanics with the classical limit (ℏ → 0) recovers classical mechanics via the WKB approximation

    This sourceThe three independent WKB papers; support the semiclassical tunneling result T ≈ exp(−2S/ℏ) vanishing as ℏ→0 and the classical-limit recovery (D13-103).

• Hidden Path and Barrier Crossing
  • T5 — Quantum Tunneling vs Thermal Activation: Same Math, Different Physics: The exponential form exp(−action/ℏ) in quantum tunneling (WKB; Wentzel 1926, Kramers 1926, Brillouin 1926) parallels exp(−ΔE/kT) in thermal escape (Kramers 1940) and chemical activation (Arrhenius).

    Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

    Wentzel 1926 is confirmed as one of the WKB papers behind the semiclassical exponential, but its abstract states no tunneling factor, no exp(-action/hbar), and nothing on thermal activation.

    “In dieser Note soll eine Methode entwickelt werden, die Eigenwertprobleme der Schrödingerschen „Wellenmechanik“ durch sukzessive Approximation von dem Grenzfall der klassischen Mechanik (bzw. der früheren Quantentheorie) aus zu lösen.”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.

• https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01451751 ×1

Registry ID ref:8ca0c987b505 · see in the full table