Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with History Flow Visualizations.¶
Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. (2004). Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with History Flow Visualizations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 575-582.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Broken Windows Theory
- Online communities — unmoderated trolling, visible spam, and unaddressed harassment signal absent moderation and attract further violations; rapid vandalism reversion is engineered to break the loop.
This sourceDocuments that Wikipedia vandalism is typically reverted within minutes (median survival of minutes), so most users never see it — engineered fast reversion that breaks the disorder-signaling loop before density crosses threshold.
- Online communities — unmoderated trolling, visible spam, and unaddressed harassment signal absent moderation and attract further violations; rapid vandalism reversion is engineered to break the loop.
- Eyes On The Street
- In public-edit knowledge bases like Wikipedia, vandalism is caught faster than centralised review could manage because many editors with an article on their watchlist incidentally observe each other.
This sourceShows Wikipedia vandalism is reverted very rapidly because many editors watching pages provide distributed incidental observation faster than centralized review.
- In public-edit knowledge bases like Wikipedia, vandalism is caught faster than centralised review could manage because many editors with an article on their watchlist incidentally observe each other.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8d2fa48843bf · see in the full table