Archaeology¶
Renfrew, C., & Bahn, P. (2016). Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Evidence
- And in archaeology, physical remains and stratigraphic context are evidence for inferences about past life, with taphonomy supplying the trace-producing-mechanism analysis.
This sourceThames & Hudson. Treats inference from physical remains and stratigraphic context, with formation processes and taphonomy supplying the trace-producing-mechanism analysis for archaeological evidence.
- And in archaeology, physical remains and stratigraphic context are evidence for inferences about past life, with taphonomy supplying the trace-producing-mechanism analysis.
- Primary vs. Secondary Sources
- The structural challenge — adjudicating between competing primary witnesses with different production conditions — is the same one Renfrew and Bahn (2016) treat in archaeology, where artifact authentication, stratigraphic context, and provenance must be settled before any secondary synthesis of cultural meaning is attempted.
This sourceStandard archaeological methods text; treats artifact authentication, stratigraphic context, and provenance as primary-source operations that must be settled before any secondary synthesis of cultural meaning.
- The structural challenge — adjudicating between competing primary witnesses with different production conditions — is the same one Renfrew and Bahn (2016) treat in archaeology, where artifact authentication, stratigraphic context, and provenance must be settled before any secondary synthesis of cultural meaning is attempted.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8d99e447537d · see in the full table