Social Change and Collective Memory¶
Schwartz, B. (1991). Social Change and Collective Memory: The Democratization of George Washington. American Sociological Review, 56(2), 221-236.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Collective Memory
- Schwartz 1991 demonstrates empirically how collective memory of George Washington shifted across American historical periods to match present political needs, illustrating the active reconstruction process
This sourceEmpirically tracks how the collective memory of George Washington shifted (aristocratic → democratic) across historical periods to match present political values, illustrating active reconstruction.
- Schwartz 1991 demonstrates empirically how collective memory of George Washington shifted across American historical periods to match present political needs, illustrating the active reconstruction process
- Scenario Planning
- (1) Scenario planning constructs a small set (typically 3–5) of internally consistent, structurally distinct stories about how the future might unfold, each built by systematically varying the most critical and most uncertain driving forces shaping the decision environment, the canonical practitioner formulation given by Schwartz (1991).
This sourceSchwartz demonstrates empirically that collective memory of George Washington shifts across historical periods to match present political needs and identities, illustrating active reconstruction.
- (1) Scenario planning constructs a small set (typically 3–5) of internally consistent, structurally distinct stories about how the future might unfold, each built by systematically varying the most critical and most uncertain driving forces shaping the decision environment, the canonical practitioner formulation given by Schwartz (1991).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8e93b83003b7 · see in the full table