Skip to content

Personal Influence

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Free Press.

Type
Book
Intellectual base
Review or monograph
Year
1955
Link
https://www.routledge.com/Personal-Influence-The-Part-Played-by-People-in-the-Flow-of-Mass-Communications/Katz-Lazarsfeld/p/book/9781412805070
Cited from
sociology_anthropology

Cited by

3 citations across 3 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Network Broker Role
    • In communication studies, the opinion leader receives media messages first and re-transmits to their social network, shaping the message in transit.

      This sourceEstablishes the two-step flow and the opinion leader — who receives media messages first and re-transmits to a social network, shaping them in transit; the communication-studies broker, later carried into micro-influencer marketing.

      Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

      The publisher's description of Katz and Lazarsfeld's 1955 study states that media messages are mediated by informal opinion leaders who interpret and diffuse them into their personal networks — the two-step flow the claim names.

      “validating Paul Lazarsfeld's serendipitous discovery that messages from the media may be further mediated by informal "opinion leaders" who intercept, interpret, and diffuse what they see and hear to the personal networks in which they are embedded”

      From the work's full text.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Domain-specific

Mechanisms

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 3 citations: 1 supported, 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.

Registry ID ref:8e968960867a · see in the full table