Games of Strategy¶
Dixit, A. K., & Skeath, S. (2004). Games of Strategy. W. W. Norton.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Matching pennies
- Its structural skeleton (strictly competitive payoffs, best-response cycle, unique mixed equilibrium, unpredictability as the equilibrium discipline) is shared by penalty kicks in football, tax-audit interactions, inspection games, pursuit-evasion in military and ecological contexts, and randomised protocols in cryptography, all of which are analysed as instances of the same anti-coordination zero-sum structure
This sourceAn undergraduate game-theory text carrying the structure itself - the minimax method for zero-sum games, the absence of a pure-strategy equilibrium, and the forced mixed equilibrium - together with its sporting instance (the tennis passing shot, and a section of empirical evidence on mixing) and its evolutionary instance (the Hawk-Dove game); its contents cover neither inspection and tax-audit games, nor pursuit-evasion, nor cryptographic protocols.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Its structural skeleton (strictly competitive payoffs, best-response cycle, unique mixed equilibrium, unpredictability as the equilibrium discipline) is shared by penalty kicks in football, tax-audit interactions, inspection games, pursuit-evasion in military and ecological contexts, and randomised protocols in cryptography, all of which are analysed as instances of the same anti-coordination zero-sum structure
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8ea935a4de8c · see in the full table