The Verbal Icon¶
Wimsatt, W. K., & Beardsley, M. C. (1954). The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. University of Kentucky Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Reader-Response
- By insisting the third is its own locus of meaning, the frame exposes two long-standing critical reflexes as one-sided rather than authoritative — the intentional fallacy of fixing meaning to the author's design, and the affective fallacy of dismissing the reader's response as irrelevant noise
This sourceThe volume collecting "The Intentional Fallacy" and "The Affective Fallacy", which argue against fixing a poem's meaning by the author's intention and against judging it by its emotional effects.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“Prologue to The Way of the World THE [INTENTIONAL FALLACY] THE CLAIM of the author’s “intention” upon”
- By insisting the third is its own locus of meaning, the frame exposes two long-standing critical reflexes as one-sided rather than authoritative — the intentional fallacy of fixing meaning to the author's design, and the affective fallacy of dismissing the reader's response as irrelevant noise
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8f22c5120f0f · see in the full table