Is There a 'Big Five' in Teamwork?¶
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is There a 'Big Five' in Teamwork?. Small Group Research, 36(5), 555-599.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Sponsor Vacuum
- From clinical safety come closed-loop communication and "attending must respond within N minutes" rules, which make engagement enforceable rather than presumed.
This sourceEstablishes closed-loop communication as a core teamwork coordinating mechanism, the basis of clinical-safety escalation and response-time rules.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract does establish closed-loop communication as a supporting coordinating mechanism for teamwork, but it supplies nothing about clinical safety, 'outside options', or N-minute response rules.
“the authors examine how these core components require supporting coordinating mechanisms (e.g., shared mental modes, closed-loop communication, and mutual trust) and vary in their importance during the life of the team and the team task.”
- From clinical safety come closed-loop communication and "attending must respond within N minutes" rules, which make engagement enforceable rather than presumed.
Mechanisms¶
- Readback / Teach-Back
- Its logic is closed-loop communication: a message is not complete until the sender has confirmed the receiver's understanding matches intent.
This sourceDefines closed-loop communication as a three-step exchange completed when the sender verifies that the receiver obtained the intended message.
- Its logic is closed-loop communication: a message is not complete until the sender has confirmed the receiver's understanding matches intent.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8f311c7059bf · see in the full table