Sandvik Aktiebolag v. E.J. Co., 121 F.3d 669 (Fed. Cir. 1997)¶
Sandvik Aktiebolag v. E.J. Co., 121 F.3d 669 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Doctrine of Repair and Reconstruction
- Considering all facts and rejecting a bright-line rule, the court held that the process reconstructed a spent device
This sourceCir. 1997). Supplies Sandvik's totality-of-the-circumstances holding that retipping a spent, non-resharpenable drill by brazing on new carbide and remachining the patented cutting geometry is reconstruction, not repair.
- Considering all facts and rejecting a bright-line rule, the court held that the process reconstructed a spent device
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8f445b878bf1 · see in the full table