Human Interface Guidelines¶
Inc, A. (2024). Human Interface Guidelines: Accessibility.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Perceivable Design
- Web accessibility (WCAG 2.x). The home turf: the principle, its four guidelines (1.1 Text Alternatives, 1.2 Time-based Media, 1.3 Adaptable, 1.4 Distinguishable) and the success criteria beneath them drive conformance audits, design systems, and procurement standards across the public and private sector. Regulatory accessibility frameworks. Section 508, the European procurement standard EN 301 549 (which reproduces WCAG's requirements, Perceivable ones included), and equivalent regulatory frameworks build the principle into procurement requirements, precisely because the single-channel-dependency test is stable enough to audit and enforce identically. Mobile and native-app accessibility. The same obligations re-expressed in platform terms — VoiceOver/TalkBack labels, dynamic type, system contrast — under the iOS HIG and Android accessibility guidance
This sourceApple's accessibility guidance for VoiceOver labels, Dynamic Type and minimum and system-level contrast on its platforms.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Web accessibility (WCAG 2.x). The home turf: the principle, its four guidelines (1.1 Text Alternatives, 1.2 Time-based Media, 1.3 Adaptable, 1.4 Distinguishable) and the success criteria beneath them drive conformance audits, design systems, and procurement standards across the public and private sector. Regulatory accessibility frameworks. Section 508, the European procurement standard EN 301 549 (which reproduces WCAG's requirements, Perceivable ones included), and equivalent regulatory frameworks build the principle into procurement requirements, precisely because the single-channel-dependency test is stable enough to audit and enforce identically. Mobile and native-app accessibility. The same obligations re-expressed in platform terms — VoiceOver/TalkBack labels, dynamic type, system contrast — under the iOS HIG and Android accessibility guidance
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:8fc5c034c218 · see in the full table