A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing¶
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Mastery Learning
- Anderson and Krathwohl's (2001) revised taxonomy makes the depth-of-knowledge dimension explicit, distinguishing remembering and applying within a unit from analyzing, evaluating, and creating across novel contexts — categories any mastery threshold must consciously target if transfer is intended.
This sourceLongman. Revised cognitive taxonomy spanning remember through create; provides a framework against which summative-assessment construct underrepresentation (narrowing to lower-order objectives) can be diagnosed.
- Anderson and Krathwohl's (2001) revised taxonomy makes the depth-of-knowledge dimension explicit, distinguishing remembering and applying within a unit from analyzing, evaluating, and creating across novel contexts — categories any mastery threshold must consciously target if transfer is intended.
- Summative Assessment
- T1: Measurement Reliability vs Construct Coverage. As Anderson and Krathwohl's (2001) revised taxonomy of cognitive objectives makes explicit, learning targets span a wide range from remembering through creating; assessment that reliably measures only the lower end of that range underrepresents the construct it purports to evaluate.
This sourceLongman. Revised cognitive taxonomy spanning remember through create; provides a framework against which summative-assessment construct underrepresentation (narrowing to lower-order objectives) can be diagnosed.
- T1: Measurement Reliability vs Construct Coverage. As Anderson and Krathwohl's (2001) revised taxonomy of cognitive objectives makes explicit, learning targets span a wide range from remembering through creating; assessment that reliably measures only the lower end of that range underrepresents the construct it purports to evaluate.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:91bb25c6e50d · see in the full table