A Critical Review of Simulation-Based Medical Education Research¶
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2010). A Critical Review of Simulation-Based Medical Education Research: 2003–2009. Medical Education, 44(1), 50-63.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Sandboxing
- Education and training: flight simulators, surgical trainers, business-school cases, and war games let learners exercise consequential decisions without the real consequences.
This sourceReviews simulation-based training as bounded, repeatable exercise of consequential skills without real-world consequences.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract of this SBME review supports simulation training for medical skills, but it never states the claim's 'no real consequences' property and says nothing about flight simulators, business-school cases, or war games.
“This article reviews and critically evaluates historical and contemporary research on simulation‐based medical education (SBME).”
- Education and training: flight simulators, surgical trainers, business-school cases, and war games let learners exercise consequential decisions without the real consequences.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:92187a0f2645 · see in the full table