Notaries Public — Lost in Cyberspace, or Key Business Professionals of the Future?

Closen, M. L., & Richards, R. J. (1997). Notaries Public — Lost in Cyberspace, or Key Business Professionals of the Future?. The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law, 15(4).

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1997

Volume

15

Issue

4

Link

https://repository.law.uic.edu/jitpl/vol15/iss4/2

Cited from

law_governance

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Attestation
  • Provenance is a history; attestation is a point-in-time tamper-evident commitment. Not reputation. Reputation is an aggregate judgement of a party's trustworthiness built from past behaviour; attestation says nothing about whether the principal is trustworthy, only that this principal committed to this artifact. Not validation. Validation asks whether the artifact's content is fit, true, or correct; attestation deliberately decouples the binding from that substantive question — a notary attests a signing, not the deed's truth.

    This sourceExplains that a notarial act attests only that a particular person signed before the notary on a date — not the truth or validity of the document's contents.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:934510404278 · see in the full table