The Wide Lens: A New Strategy for Innovation¶
Adner, R. (2012). The Wide Lens: A New Strategy for Innovation: A New Strategy for Innovation. Portfolio/Penguin.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Ecosystem Mismatch
- Ron Adner's The Wide Lens (2012) uses Michelin's PAX run-flat tire system as the defining case
This sourceAdner's The Wide Lens, which takes Michelin's PAX run-flat tire system as its main case of an innovation ecosystem mismatch. Adner (2012) documents the Michelin PAX system's failure despite strong execution.
SupportedVerified against a saved copy of the source
“THE WIDE LENS PAX Run-Flat Vehicle Figure 1.3: Path to market for the PAX run-flat tire innovation.”
- Ron Adner's The Wide Lens (2012) uses Michelin's PAX run-flat tire system as the defining case
- Timing Risk
- The idea is in active use in venture capital, product development, public-policy innovation, and technology commercialisation; the canonical case file includes General Magic (1990–2002), the Apple Newton, electronic medical records initiatives of the 1990s, ride-sharing before smartphone adoption, and synchronous video calling before broadband penetration
This sourceAdner's ecosystem framework - co-innovation and adoption-chain risk, the sound product failing in an unready environment - which is the concept behind this failure mode and which supplies the electronic-health-records case; the remaining items in the case file are not his.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- The idea is in active use in venture capital, product development, public-policy innovation, and technology commercialisation; the canonical case file includes General Magic (1990–2002), the Apple Newton, electronic medical records initiatives of the 1990s, ride-sharing before smartphone adoption, and synchronous video calling before broadband penetration
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 1 supported, 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:93bf290d9e8e · see in the full table