Current findings from research on structured abstracts¶
Hartley, J. (2004). Current findings from research on structured abstracts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(3), 368-371.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Inverted Pyramid
- Search-result snippets and academic abstracts. Title and key fact first, bottom-truncated by layout; structured and results-first abstracts move conventional sectioning toward the pyramid.
This sourceReviews evidence that structured and results-first abstracts move conventional abstract sectioning toward a front-loaded, importance-ordered form.
- Search-result snippets and academic abstracts. Title and key fact first, bottom-truncated by layout; structured and results-first abstracts move conventional sectioning toward the pyramid.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:940c6bd119a1 · see in the full table