Stated versus revealed preferences¶
de Corte, K., Cairns, J., & Grieve, R. (2021). Stated versus revealed preferences: An approach to reduce bias. Health Economics, 30(5), 1095-1123.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Revealed Preference
- Behavioral analytics and UX: clickstream, dwell time, and A/B tests — what users do reveals preferences that surveys about the same page systematically misreport.
This sourceDocuments the systematic gap between what people say they prefer and what their behaviour reveals (the say–do / hypothetical-bias gap), and methods to reconcile the two channels.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The paper documents a stated-versus-actual gap (survey intentions over-predict blood donation) in health economics, not clickstream or UX behaviour.
“The general literature comparing stated and revealed preferences (RP) has found that individuals tend to overstate their valuation of a particular good, service or outcome”
- Behavioral analytics and UX: clickstream, dwell time, and A/B tests — what users do reveals preferences that surveys about the same page systematically misreport.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:94190fe2ed04 · see in the full table