American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment¶
Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., et al. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Validity Scale
- The AACN consensus literature recommends multiple validity indicators and integration with interviews, records, behavioral observations, and other assessment evidence
This sourceThe AACN consensus statements are the source of both halves - the recommendation to use multiple validity indicators, stand-alone and embedded, across domains, and the requirement that their results be interpreted within the totality of records, interview, behavioural observation and test data rather than in isolation.
SupportedVerified against the source
- The AACN consensus literature recommends multiple validity indicators and integration with interviews, records, behavioral observations, and other assessment evidence
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:944ffadd341e · see in the full table