American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment¶
Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., et al. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Validity Scale
- The AACN consensus literature recommends multiple validity indicators and integration with interviews, records, behavioral observations, and other assessment evidence
This sourceThe AACN consensus statements are the source of both halves - the recommendation to use multiple validity indicators, stand-alone and embedded, across domains, and the requirement that their results be interpreted within the totality of records, interview, behavioural observation and test data rather than in isolation.
- The AACN consensus literature recommends multiple validity indicators and integration with interviews, records, behavioral observations, and other assessment evidence
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:944ffadd341e · see in the full table