Studies of Independence and Conformity¶
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1-70.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Conformity
- The phenomenon was first isolated experimentally by Asch (1956), whose line-judgment paradigm showed that subjects with intact perception nonetheless conformed to a unanimous but wrong majority on roughly a third of critical trials.
This sourceLine-judgment paradigm in which subjects with intact perception conform to a unanimous wrong majority on roughly a third (mean 32%) of critical trials — directly supports the founding experimental claim. Live-verified.
- The phenomenon was first isolated experimentally by Asch (1956), whose line-judgment paradigm showed that subjects with intact perception nonetheless conformed to a unanimous but wrong majority on roughly a third of critical trials.
- Groupthink
- Herding Behavior
- No individual has incentive to break the cascade because the cost of being the first contrarian is high and the benefit (if wrong) is nil.
This sourceClassic experimental demonstration that subjects abandon correct private judgments under unanimous group pressure even on perceptually trivial tasks.
- No individual has incentive to break the cascade because the cost of being the first contrarian is high and the benefit (if wrong) is nil.
- Information Cascade
- A person may conform to group dress codes from social anxiety; a decision-maker in a cascade rationally updates belief based on observed choices, independent of conformity motive.
This sourceClassic experimental demonstration that subjects abandon correct private judgments under unanimous group pressure even on perceptually trivial tasks.
- A person may conform to group dress codes from social anxiety; a decision-maker in a cascade rationally updates belief based on observed choices, independent of conformity motive.
- Public vs. Private Contexts
- Preference expressions diverge sharply: publicly, people voice norm-aligned preferences (eating meat if the group does, expressing political views congruent with the social circle); privately, they reveal heterodox preferences (vegetarian inclinations despite social pressure, political uncertainty despite public alignment), a divergence Asch (1956) documented in classic conformity experiments where public agreement masked private disagreement.
This sourceClassic experimental demonstration that subjects abandon correct private judgments under unanimous group pressure even on perceptually trivial tasks.
- Preference expressions diverge sharply: publicly, people voice norm-aligned preferences (eating meat if the group does, expressing political views congruent with the social circle); privately, they reveal heterodox preferences (vegetarian inclinations despite social pressure, political uncertainty despite public alignment), a divergence Asch (1956) documented in classic conformity experiments where public agreement masked private disagreement.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:9467d3e39161 · see in the full table