Control of Moth Pests by Mating Disruption¶
Cardé, R. T., & Minks, A. K. (1995). Control of Moth Pests by Mating Disruption: Successes and Constraints. Annual Review of Entomology, 40, 559-585.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Supernormal Stimulus
- The same shape governs mate detection under engineered imagery, attention and media engagement under variable-ratio reinforcement and social-validation loops, gambling design under intermittent reinforcement and near-miss cues, pest control via super-ancestral pheromone concentrations (the prime exploited deliberately rather than accidentally), brood-parasite gape and call exaggerations, and recommendation systems whose engagement-optimized content is by construction an exaggeration along the rewarded dimensions.
This sourceReviews mating disruption: flooding the environment with synthetic sex pheromone at unnaturally high concentration so males cannot locate females — the supernormal-stimulus dynamic exploited deliberately in pest control.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract supports synthetic-pheromone mating disruption for moth pests, but not a deliberate supernormal-stimulus exploitation; it calls the mechanism uncertain.
“A formulated copy of this message is used to regulate mating of many important pests, including the pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella), the oriental fruit moth (Grapholita molesta), and the tomato pinworm (Keiferia lycopersicella).”
- The same shape governs mate detection under engineered imagery, attention and media engagement under variable-ratio reinforcement and social-validation loops, gambling design under intermittent reinforcement and near-miss cues, pest control via super-ancestral pheromone concentrations (the prime exploited deliberately rather than accidentally), brood-parasite gape and call exaggerations, and recommendation systems whose engagement-optimized content is by construction an exaggeration along the rewarded dimensions.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:94ceb8f0e4c8 · see in the full table