Reproducibility and Replicability in Science¶
Sciences, B. o. B. C. a. S., Education, D. o. B. a. S. S. a., Board, N. a. R. S., Studies, D. o. E. a. L., Analytics, B. o. M. S. a., Sciences, D. o. E. a. P., Affairs, P. a. G., et al. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. The National Academies Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Reproducibility & Replicability
- Names the specific epistemic standards — reproducibility (same data) and replicability (new data)
This sourceNational Academies foundational distinction between reproducibility (same data) and replicability (new data).
- Names the specific epistemic standards — reproducibility (same data) and replicability (new data)
Mechanisms¶
- Independent Recomputation or Replication
- Its strength is that it is the most decisive form of check: it can contradict the producer with an equally-derived counter-result, catching errors that tracing and re-reading miss entirely — the wrong-but-well-documented calculation whose paperwork is immaculate and whose answer is simply incorrect.
This sourceDefines independent replication as obtaining new evidence that can agree with or conflict with an earlier result.
- Its strength is that it is the most decisive form of check: it can contradict the producer with an equally-derived counter-result, catching errors that tracing and re-reading miss entirely — the wrong-but-well-documented calculation whose paperwork is immaculate and whose answer is simply incorrect.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:95820594207a · see in the full table