Are Scientific Editors Reliable Gatekeepers of the Publication Process?

Petrescu, M., & Krishen, A. S. (2019). Are Scientific Editors Reliable Gatekeepers of the Publication Process?. Biological Conservation, 238.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2019

DOI

10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.020

Link

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.020

Cited from

communication_media_studies

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Gatekeeping
  • Scientific peer review. Editors and referees deciding what enters the literature; desk-rejection is a particularly pure case — binary, fast, single-arbiter.

    This sourceExamines editors and referees as gatekeepers of the literature, with desk-rejection as a fast, single-arbiter binary gate whose consistency and error profile are measurable.

Verification

This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:95d32535fa9d · see in the full table