Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability¶
Calabresi, G., & Melamed, A. D. (1972). Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: One view of the cathedral. Harvard Law Review, 85(6), 1089-1128.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Mandatory vs. Default Norms
- Calabresi and Melamed (1972), in their classic taxonomy of property rules, liability rules, and inalienability rules, treat the strongest form of entrenchment—inalienability—as a distinct legal category that places certain entitlements beyond consensual exchange entirely; Pierik (2018) applies this framing to mandatory-vaccination policy, examining when public-health rationales justify shifting from default-recommended to legally mandated immunization regimes.
This sourceTaxonomize entitlement protection into property rules, liability rules, and inalienability rules—the strongest form of entrenchment removing entitlements from consensual exchange entirely.
- Calabresi and Melamed (1972), in their classic taxonomy of property rules, liability rules, and inalienability rules, treat the strongest form of entrenchment—inalienability—as a distinct legal category that places certain entitlements beyond consensual exchange entirely; Pierik (2018) applies this framing to mandatory-vaccination policy, examining when public-health rationales justify shifting from default-recommended to legally mandated immunization regimes.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:9608c41e6e62 · see in the full table