Scientific Peer Review

Bornmann, L. (2011). Scientific Peer Review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 197-245.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

2011

Volume

45

Issue

1

Pages

197-245

DOI

10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112

DOI registrant

Wiley

Link

https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112

Cited from

engineering_design, statistics_experimental_design

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Instrument Interpretive Drift
  • in academic peer review (acceptance standards drifting across editor cohorts),

    This sourceReviews evidence that peer-review acceptance standards and reviewer behaviour vary across reviewers and over time.

• Quality Control
  • Publishing and editorial: Fact-checking, peer review (academic journals), editorial review (books, magazines), copy-editing, fact-accuracy verification, plagiarism detection, source validation, with Bornmann (2011) providing a comprehensive review of peer review's quality-control function in scholarly publishing.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:962ae6207b0a · see in the full table