Law's Empire¶
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law's Empire. Harvard University Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Adjudication (Dispute Resolution)
This sourceDevelops 'law as integrity' and constructive interpretation — reading legal practice as the best instance of the principles that justify it — supplying the counterfactual structure of the abstract-reasoning account (D49-006).
- Interpretation
- The counterfactual is substrate-neutral: it works on a statute, a manuscript, a dataset, a CT image, a feature vector, or a peptide presentation — paralleling Dworkin's (1986) constructive-interpretation method, in which the best reading is the one that would survive a shift in the principles that justify it.
This sourceDevelops "law as integrity" and the method of constructive interpretation — reading legal practice as the best instance of the principles that justify it — and supplies the counterfactual structure (shift the justifying principles, shift the reading) used in the prime's abstract-reasoning account.
- The counterfactual is substrate-neutral: it works on a statute, a manuscript, a dataset, a CT image, a feature vector, or a peptide presentation — paralleling Dworkin's (1986) constructive-interpretation method, in which the best reading is the one that would survive a shift in the principles that justify it.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:963c054f42c4 · see in the full table