Red Team¶
Zenko, M. (2015). Red Team: How to Succeed by Thinking Like the Enemy. Basic Books.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Arms-Race Risk Register
- The discipline is to red-team the adversary model with someone playing the other side sincerely, and to treat the register as a sensor whose thresholds trigger the damping protocol, not as license to strike first.
This sourceZenko describes red teaming as structured adversarial analysis used to understand a competitor's interests, intentions, and capabilities.
- The discipline is to red-team the adversary model with someone playing the other side sincerely, and to treat the register as a sensor whose thresholds trigger the damping protocol, not as license to strike first.
- Red-Team Challenge
- … inside the frame the builders set; a red team deliberately steps outside it to find what that frame cannot see — a practice born in military wargaming and now standard in security and safety engineering precisely because it surfaces the misuse routes and blind spots the defenders were structurally unable to imagine.
This sourceDefines red teaming as adopting an adversary’s perspective, traces it through military and security practice, and describes its use to expose weaknesses before consequential action.
- … inside the frame the builders set; a red team deliberately steps outside it to find what that frame cannot see — a practice born in military wargaming and now standard in security and safety engineering precisely because it surfaces the misuse routes and blind spots the defenders were structurally unable to imagine.
- Red-Team Coherence Review
- Institutionalizing an adversary is the point: red teaming works precisely because the challenger is rewarded for finding the break, not for endorsing the plan.
This sourceDescribes red teams as institutionalized challengers tasked with exposing weaknesses and testing prevailing plans rather than endorsing them.
- Institutionalizing an adversary is the point: red teaming works precisely because the challenger is rewarded for finding the break, not for endorsing the plan.
- Red-Team Failure Review
- Its strength is that it defeats the failure mode insiders structurally cannot: it names the politically unsafe cause, because the naming is done by people with nothing to lose — the logic that gives organized red teaming its value across military, intelligence, and security practice
This sourcePresents organized red teams as professional skeptics that challenge assumptions, identify vulnerabilities, and anticipate threats across military, intelligence, and security settings.
- Its strength is that it defeats the failure mode insiders structurally cannot: it names the politically unsafe cause, because the naming is done by people with nothing to lose — the logic that gives organized red teaming its value across military, intelligence, and security practice
- Red-Team Pattern Match Review
- It fails when the red team is captured or ceremonial (a token skeptic no one heeds), when it is so reflexively contrarian that it cries wolf on every match (attack fatigue), or when it is convened after the decision to launder it
This sourceWarns that red teams fail when their challenge is ignored or reduced to a rubber stamp, including exercises used to validate decisions already made.
- It fails when the red team is captured or ceremonial (a token skeptic no one heeds), when it is so reflexively contrarian that it cries wolf on every match (attack fatigue), or when it is convened after the decision to launder it
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 3 other ways.
- https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/micah-zenko/red-team/9780465048946/ ×2
- https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/micah-zenko/red-team/9780465069954/ ×1
- https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/micah-zenko/red-team/9780465073955/ ×1
Registry ID ref:96ed1db4e91d · see in the full table