Degeneracy¶
Whitacre, J. M. (2010). Degeneracy: a link between evolvability, robustness and complexity in biological systems. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 263(1), 143-150.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Functional Redundancy (Degeneracy)
- As Whitacre (2010) argues, degeneracy is a specific multi-path mechanism that links robustness, evolvability, and complexity in biological systems and stands apart from other robustness mechanisms — negative feedback (homeostasis stabilizes around a setpoint), buffering (excess capacity absorbs transient excursions), damping (dissipation reduces oscillation), self-repair (broken components fix themselves), and structural over-engineering (single mechanism built much stronger than nominal load).
This sourceSynthesizes the case that degeneracy is a specific multi-path mechanism distinct from buffering, self-repair, and over-engineering; supports distinguishing redundancy from robustness generally.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Whitacre argues degeneracy links robustness, evolvability and complexity and differs from simple redundancy; he does not contrast it with feedback, damping, self-repair or over-engineering.
“we present evidence that degeneracy is a fundamental source of robustness, it is intimately tied to multi-scaled complexity, and it establishes conditions that are necessary for system evolvability.”
- As Whitacre (2010) argues, degeneracy is a specific multi-path mechanism that links robustness, evolvability, and complexity in biological systems and stands apart from other robustness mechanisms — negative feedback (homeostasis stabilizes around a setpoint), buffering (excess capacity absorbs transient excursions), damping (dissipation reduces oscillation), self-repair (broken components fix themselves), and structural over-engineering (single mechanism built much stronger than nominal load).
- Robustness
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:978358b30caa · see in the full table