Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés archaïques¶
Mauss, M. (1925). Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés archaïques: Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. L'Année Sociologique.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Exchange
- Mauss's (1925) study of gift economies in archaic societies, where strict reciprocal obligation operates without prices or money, secured the broader frame: the invariant is reciprocal transfer under recognized terms, and the substrate (currency, ritual, protocol, biology) is incidental.
This sourceComparative analysis of Polynesian, Melanesian, and Native American gift economies showing structured reciprocal obligation (give–accept
- Mauss's (1925) study of gift economies in archaic societies, where strict reciprocal obligation operates without prices or money, secured the broader frame: the invariant is reciprocal transfer under recognized terms, and the substrate (currency, ritual, protocol, biology) is incidental.
- Reciprocity
- Mauss's foundational anthropological analysis established that the gift is not unilateral largesse but a triplet of obligations
This sourcePresses Universitaires de France. Mauss gift triplet obligation give receive repay.
- Mauss's foundational anthropological analysis established that the gift is not unilateral largesse but a triplet of obligations
Mechanisms¶
- Communal Meal Or Exchange
- The anthropology of the gift is explicit that a gift obliges a return and thereby ties giver and receiver together.
This sourceShows that gifts are socially obligatory exchanges: they call for return and help constitute durable relationships between giver and receiver.
- The anthropology of the gift is explicit that a gift obliges a return and thereby ties giver and receiver together.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not confirmed. The DOI recorded for this work did not resolve when it was last checked, so it is shown above but not linked. The citation may still be sound; the recorded identifier is not. Flagged for repair.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:9844cc8be0fe · see in the full table