Ridge v Baldwin

United Kingdom House of Lords. (1963/1964). Ridge v Baldwin. Appeal Cases.

Type

Court case

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1964 this edition · first published 1963

Link

https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1963/2.html

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Mechanisms

• Community Moderation Process
  • The discipline that separates moderation from a mob is the oldest one in adjudication — audi alteram partem, hear the other side
• Outcome Responsibility Review Panel
  • The principle underneath it is natural justice — that no one should be judged without a fair chance to answer the case against them.

    This sourceAffirms that natural justice requires a fair opportunity to answer the case before an adverse judgment is made.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:986d60554f43 · see in the full table