The Use of Scoring Rubrics¶
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity and Educational Consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Criterion Rubric
- Its strength is repeatability: a good rubric raises inter-rater reliability — the degree to which independent reviewers reach the same judgment on the same work.
This sourceFinds that well-designed scoring rubrics can improve scoring reliability, including agreement among raters judging the same performance.
- Its strength is repeatability: a good rubric raises inter-rater reliability — the degree to which independent reviewers reach the same judgment on the same work.
- Grading Rubric
- The board also runs calibration sessions where examiners grade shared scripts and reconcile, tightening inter-rater agreement
This sourceFinds that rater training can improve the reliability of rubric-based scoring.
- The board also runs calibration sessions where examiners grade shared scripts and reconcile, tightening inter-rater agreement
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:989e8d49010d · see in the full table