Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports¶
Evans, W., Waller, P. C., & Davis, S. (2001). Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Adverse Drug Event
- Clinical practice — the bedside home, daily use in prescribing, dispensing, and monitoring, weighing the benefit-to-harm margin for this patient, at this dose, in this co-medication context. Pharmacovigilance and post-market surveillance — the dedicated discipline, where spontaneous-reporting systems (FAERS, Yellow Card, the Uppsala data) and disproportionality/Bayesian signal detection surface above-background (drug, event) pairs
This sourceThe proportional reporting ratio as a signal-generation tool, developed and validated on the UK Yellow Card spontaneous-reporting database; the Bayesian methods and the other reporting systems named alongside it are elsewhere.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Clinical practice — the bedside home, daily use in prescribing, dispensing, and monitoring, weighing the benefit-to-harm margin for this patient, at this dose, in this co-medication context. Pharmacovigilance and post-market surveillance — the dedicated discipline, where spontaneous-reporting systems (FAERS, Yellow Card, the Uppsala data) and disproportionality/Bayesian signal detection surface above-background (drug, event) pairs
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:98c5466d142b · see in the full table