Leading Change¶
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press.
Cited by¶
6 citations across 6 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Activation Energy
- Instead of asking "Why won't people adopt this?" (a question that invites blame or despair), activation energy asks "What is the minimum energy required?" and "How can we lower that barrier?"
This sourceSUPPORTS the claim that Kotter operationalizes barrier removal and short-term wins in the eight-step change framework.
- Instead of asking "Why won't people adopt this?" (a question that invites blame or despair), activation energy asks "What is the minimum energy required?" and "How can we lower that barrier?"
- Resistance to Change
- Side Effect
- Ecology and environmental policy: introducing a species, damming a river, or applying a pesticide produces cascades far beyond the targeted change; the "unintended consequences" literature is largely about side effects under another name. Organizational change: a process change aimed at one team shifts behavior in others (gaming, attrition, eroded trust); change management is fundamentally about mapping side effects before deployment.
This sourceFoundational change-management text treating organizational change as requiring anticipation of effects across stakeholders beyond the targeted unit.
- Ecology and environmental policy: introducing a species, damming a river, or applying a pesticide produces cascades far beyond the targeted change; the "unintended consequences" literature is largely about side effects under another name. Organizational change: a process change aimed at one team shifts behavior in others (gaming, attrition, eroded trust); change management is fundamentally about mapping side effects before deployment.
- Signal Decay and Fadeout
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
- Transformation
- Visioning
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 6 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:98d543b05d78 · see in the full table