Ecological Inference in Voting Rights Act Disputes¶
Greiner, D. J. (2007). Ecological Inference in Voting Rights Act Disputes: Where Are We Now, and Where Do We Want to Be?.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Ecological Inference Problem
- Expert witnesses instead take precinct-level election returns together with Census racial composition and run ecological inference — King's method and the Duncan-Davis bounds — to estimate the fraction of each racial group supporting each candidate
This sourceA review of the ecological inference methods used to infer racial voting patterns in Voting Rights Act litigation, where the secret ballot hides individual votes.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Expert witnesses instead take precinct-level election returns together with Census racial composition and run ecological inference — King's method and the Duncan-Davis bounds — to estimate the fraction of each racial group supporting each candidate
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:99237c60cee6 · see in the full table