Collision Frequency of Artificial Satellites¶
Kessler, D. J., & Cour‐Palais, B. G. (1978). Collision Frequency of Artificial Satellites: The Creation of a Debris Belt. Journal of Geophysical Research, 83, 2637-2646.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Birthday Problem
- In orbital mechanics, a shell of altitude holds \(N\) tracked objects in a finite volume; the risk of some pair of them colliding scales as \(N^2\), so a doubling of objects in a band is treated as a quadrupling of pairwise conjunction exposure — the quantitative spine of Kessler-syndrome concern and the reason debris-mitigation policy targets occupancy rather than any single object.
This sourceShows orbital collision frequency among N objects in a shell scales with the square of occupancy — the quadratic pair-count behind Kessler-syndrome concern and occupancy-targeted debris mitigation.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract backs the qualitative frame — more objects raise collision probability and can cascade into a debris belt — but states no N² pair-scaling or policy rationale.
“As the number of artificial satellites in earth orbit increases, the probability of collisions between satellites also increases.”
- In orbital mechanics, a shell of altitude holds \(N\) tracked objects in a finite volume; the risk of some pair of them colliding scales as \(N^2\), so a doubling of objects in a band is treated as a quadrupling of pairwise conjunction exposure — the quantitative spine of Kessler-syndrome concern and the reason debris-mitigation policy targets occupancy rather than any single object.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:996eb5591612 · see in the full table