Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio

Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2012

DOI

10.1177/0748175612440286

DOI registrant

Taylor & Francis

Link

https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175612440286

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Domain-specific

• Content validity
  • … and use, domain blueprint and facets, item pool, expert qualifications and sampling, rating criteria, agreement or index calculation, revision decisions and residual coverage gaps are explicit. to An applied instance preserves the same invariant under changed scale, notation, dataset, jurisdiction, or implementation..

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:997f987539f1 · see in the full table