Reducing Intergroup Bias¶
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Psychology Press.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Identification
- The intervention this licenses is structural — organizers construct a superordinate identity and cross-cutting categories to widen the identification boundary, pulling in people whose existing self-concepts did not initially include the movement.
This sourceShows that constructing a superordinate identity and using cross-cutting categories widens the in-group boundary — the structural intervention for broadening identification.
- The intervention this licenses is structural — organizers construct a superordinate identity and cross-cutting categories to widen the identification boundary, pulling in people whose existing self-concepts did not initially include the movement.
- In-Group / Out-Group
- The same structural lever, boundary salience, runs in both directions, and recognizing it lets a reasoner anticipate both the de-biasing and the weaponizing uses of the partition from a single principle.
This sourceDevelops the Common In-Group Identity Model and dual-identity extension: superordinate categorization reduces bias, but pairing it with preserved subordinate identification reduces both bias and distinctiveness-threat backlash.
- The same structural lever, boundary salience, runs in both directions, and recognizing it lets a reasoner anticipate both the de-biasing and the weaponizing uses of the partition from a single principle.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:9bda31268142 · see in the full table