Cybersecurity Challenges and the Academic Health Center¶
Maggio, L. A., Dameff, C., Kanter, S. L., Woods, B., & Tully, J. (2021). Cybersecurity Challenges and the Academic Health Center: An Interactive Tabletop Simulation for Executives. Academic Medicine, 96(6), 850-853.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Wargaming
- Because red adapts to blue's actions rather than following a script, the exercise reaches turn-three contact conditions a static walk-through never would: blue's paper downtime procedures assume a printer network that the same compromised domain controllers have taken down, clinicians discover they hold no offline medication lists, and the prepared press statement assumes data was never exfiltrated — three silent assumptions exposed as the output, not a probability of recovery.
This sourceReports a tabletop simulation built on an evolving hospital ransomware scenario that surfaces continuity, communications, and decision-making assumptions a static walk-through misses.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Abstract confirms an evolving 3-phase ransomware tabletop simulation for health-centre executives, but says nothing of red adapting to blue or the three named assumptions.
“The 3.5-hour interactive simulation used an evolving, 3-phase case study describing a hypothetical cyberattack on an AHC with a ransomware demand.”
- Because red adapts to blue's actions rather than following a script, the exercise reaches turn-three contact conditions a static walk-through never would: blue's paper downtime procedures assume a printer network that the same compromised domain controllers have taken down, clinicians discover they hold no offline medication lists, and the prepared press statement assumes data was never exfiltrated — three silent assumptions exposed as the output, not a probability of recovery.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:9c8844f19771 · see in the full table