Skip to content

On Escalation

Kahn, H. (1965). On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios. Routledge.

Type
Book
Intellectual base
Review or monograph
Year
1965
ISBN
9781351502207
Link
https://www.routledge.com/On-Escalation-Metaphors-and-Scenarios/Kahn/p/book/9781412811620
Cited from
political_science

Cited by

5 citations across 5 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Escalation Dominance
    • In military and strategic studies, the Kahn-and-Schelling origin, escalation dominance is the canonical setting — nuclear escalation ladders, conventional-force escalation, signalling at each rung.

      This sourceOriginates the escalation-ladder framework (a definite ladder of rungs, ascent of which brings opponents closer to all-out war) and the concept of escalation dominance — prevailing at successive rungs of a conflict's intensity. Publisher catalog confirms the work and its escalation-ladder structure (ToC: 'The Rungs of The Escalation Ladder', 'The Nuclear Threshold', 'De-escalation').

      Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

      Publisher catalog copy confirms Kahn's escalation ladder with rungs and nuclear threshold, but not Schelling, escalation dominance, conventional-force escalation, or signalling.

      “At each rung of the ladder, before the climb proceeds, decisions must be made based on numerous choices. Some are clear and obvious, others obscure, but the options are always there. Thermonuclear annihilation, says Kahn, is unlikely to come through accident; but nations may elect to climb the ladder to extinction.”

      From the work's full text.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Domain-specific

Mechanisms

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's ISBN resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 5 citations: 1 supported, 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.

Registry ID ref:9cf4d439a532 · see in the full table